December 20, 2005 – 1:54 pm
Similarities between :
Girls and Windows
oBoth have a great UI.
oBoth consume large resources and do less work.
oBoth crash unexpectedly.
oBoth are not easily portable on different architectures (environment).
oBoth can’t work on low resource architectures (environment).
oBoth are costly to maintain.
oBoth give mostly unexpected outputs.
oBoth’s working often contradicts with their documentation.
oBoth are easily prone to viruses (rumors and doubts) (and they (viruses) do spread very fast in windows based networks).
oIn spite of all above disadvantages, both are liked.
Boys and Linux
oBoth have an average UI.
oBoth are robust.
oBoth are highly secure.
oBoth can be easily modified to support new concepts/features.
oBoth are efficient.
oBoth are easily portable to any architecture (environment) no matter how low are resources.
oYou can easily guess the output for your input (in Linux just open its code, for boys they are mostly transparent by nature ).
oBoth provide large support for development (work environment).
oBoth are poorly documented.
Posted in Timepass |
No Comments »